Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Justices to the Senate

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 29, 1937PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*570To The Honorable the Senate of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts:

The Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court respectfully submit these answers to the questions in an order received on the sixteenth day of April, 1937, a copy whereof is hereto annexed. These questions relate to a proposed statute authorizing the city of Salem to take by eminent domain, or acquire by purchase or otherwise, “the land in said city known as Derby Wharf” and other land in its neighborhood, all located within said city, for the purpose of constituting a memorial to the sailors of Salem. No description of “Derby…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. United States v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Allydonn Realty Corp. v. Holyoke Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Gion v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  4. Timmons v. South Carolina Tricentennial CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  5. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API