Legal Opinion

Hechler v. Emery

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1928Published

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

This stockholder’s action was instituted against Archibald C. Emery, who was president of the defendant corporations, to compel him to account for certain acts of waste. He is the owner of the entire voting stock of the defendant United Investors Securities Corporation, which constitutes but a fraction in value of the .total stock. This corporation was made a party to the action, but, as observed in Young v. Equitable Life Assurance Society (112 App. Div. 760, 762), the fact that in a stockholder’s action against directors the corporation itself is also made a party defendant does not make it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Young v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Hay v. BrookfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Hechler v. EmeryNew York Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API