Legal Opinion

People v. Worrell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1983No. 68630, (Calendar No. 11)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.

The dissent in this case, as the decision of the Court of Appeals, is based on the premise that a charge of statutory rape or criminal sexual conduct is made out by evidence of penetration of a female under the statutory age without regard to her consent. This is not disputed. The law traditionally has held that the consent of a person of such tender years to such acts will not be recognized and accordingly that consent is no defense to such a charge.

Likewise, consent is no defense to a charge of attempt to effect such sexual penetration.

However, proof of penetration or attempt to penetrate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
  2. People v. CourierMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. People v. CarlsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. LuethMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Linebaugh v. BerdishMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. StarksMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. HendricksMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. ReevesMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API