Legal Opinion
Rue v. Kentucky Retirement Systems
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided May 12, 2000No. 1999-CA-001071-MRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EMBERTON, Judge:
The sole question in this appeal is whether the Kentucky Retirement Sys-*88terns correctly calculated the amount of Bobby Rue’s disability retirement benefit in accordance with the mandate set out in Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) 61.607. Finding no error in the methodology used by the retirement systems in arriving at the amount of appellant’s “combined monthly benefit,” we affirm the judgment.
Rue was unable to return to work after sustaining a back injury in the course of his employment as a mechanic with the Kentucky State Police. As part of his application for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Feissner v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Regnier v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Jerry's Drive In, Inc. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
- Stahl v. Ramsey Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1991
- Garietz v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robinson v. City of Wichita Employees' Retirement Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Metzinger v. Kentucky Retirement SystemsKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Department of Revenue, Finance & Administration Cabinet v. Shinin' B Trailer Sales, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2015
- Robinson v. WICHITA EMPLOYEES'RET. BD.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010