Legal Opinion

Booker v. Booker

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 24, 1930No. 19958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. It is the duty of processioners, in tracing and marking land lines, to respect and follow the following rules: “Natural landmarks, being less liable to change, and not capable *381of counterfeit, shall be the most conclusive evidence; ancient or genuine landmarks, such as corner stations or marked trees, shall control the course and distance called for by the survey. If the corners are established, and the lines not marked, a straight -line, as required by the plat, shall be run, but an established marked line, though crooked, shall not be overruled; courses and distances shall be resorted to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Osteen v. WynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Booker v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dally v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. Dally v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  3. Fortson v. CaudellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API