Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Roark v. City of Hailey

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1981No. 13451PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Chief Justice.

Blaine County prosecutor R. Keith Roark commenced this quo warranto action on behalf of the state against the City of Hailey. Roark alleged that the city council had enacted an annexation ordinance in violation of Idaho’s Open Meetings Act and Local Planning Act. Roark now appeals from an adverse decision of the district court.

Jess Groves, general partner of Wood River Associates, desired to develop a tract of land outside the city limits of Hailey in Blaine County. In spring of 1978, Groves sought and obtained from the Hailey city council tentative approval of a plat…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Polillo v. DeaneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  2. Dawson Enterprises, Inc. v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Magnuson v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Commissioners' Court of Hays County v. District Judge, 22nd Judicial District of Hays CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Judge v. PociusCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of McCall v. BuxtonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Bone v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Petersen v. Franklin CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Love v. Board of Cty. Com'rs of BinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Nelson v. Boundary CountyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API