Legal Opinion

Bassing v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 16, 2009No. 2008-5107PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

The question presented in this income tax refund case is whether the release of one partner’s obligation to restore a capital account deficit is a “partnership item,” as that term is used in the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (“TEFRA”), Pub.L. 97-248, 96 Stat. 324. The Court of Federal Claims held that the release at issue in this case is most appropriately treated as a partnership item. We agree, and we therefore affirm.

I

The 1110 Bonifant Limited Partnership was organized in 1985 under Maryland law for the purpose of developing an office building in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  2. Joseph Monti and Tita Monti v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Warren E. Halle Martha D. Halle, Partners Other Than the Tax Matters Partner, and Kingstowne L. P. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  4. Transpac Drilling Venture v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  5. Buckley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. General Mills, Inc. and Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. General Mills, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  3. Leblanc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. General Mills, Inc. and Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Levin v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API