Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 22, 1996No. 86869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANSTEAD, Justice.

We have for review a decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal on the following question certified to be of great public importance:

MAY AN OUT-OF-STATE CONVICTION WHICH IS A MISDEMEANOR IN THAT STATE, BUT WHICH IS SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO A FLORIDA STATUTE IN ELEMENTS AND PENALTIES, BE DEEMED A “QUALIFIED OFFENSE” UNDER SECTION 775.084 AND USED TO IMPOSE A HABITUAL OFFENDER SENTENCE?

O’Neill v. State, 661 So.2d 1265, 1268 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed below, we answer the certified *721question in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shaw v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. State v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  3. O'NEILL v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. Antoine E. McCloud v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  3. Mogavero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Antoine E. McCloud v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  5. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API