Legal Opinion
Jaramillo v. Callen Realty
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*870OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Baer, Jr., J.
Defendant City of New York moves, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), to dismiss the complaint and all cross claims or, in the alternative, pursuant to CPLR 3212, for summary judgment. The motion to dismiss must be granted. Lovella Beres, plaintiff in one of these related actions, cross-moves to compel the City and the New York City Loft Board to comply with discovery requests and for sanctions. The cross motion is moot.
The City’s motion seems to have been made only on behalf of the City itself, not the Loft Board (the Board). I assume this was an oversight.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Garrett v. Holiday Inns, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Motyka v. City of AmsterdamNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Kircher v. City of JamestownNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wells v. City of LynchburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998