Legal Opinion

Akins v. Craig

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1931No. 21019PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. “Since the presumptions are always in favor of the verdict and judgment, and the burden is upon him who alleges error to show it, uncertainties or ambiguities in the answer to the writ of certiorari as made by the trial judge must be construed, if it can be reasonably done, so as to sustain rather than to destroy the verdict and judgment.” New Zealand Fire Ins. Co. v. Brewer, 29 Ga. App. 773 (4) (116 S. E. 922); Reese v. Miller, 33 Ga. App 442 (4) (126 S. E. 904).

2. Accordingly, in the instant case the statement made by -the juvenile-court judge in his answer to the writ of certiorari, to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New Zealand Fire Insurance v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Reese v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. York v. LowryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Hobbs v. TindolCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mobley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API