Kutz's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 139, Oct. T., 1917, by The Laurel Hill Valley Coal & Coke Company and Henry D. Green, from decree of O. C. Somerset Co., 1917, No. 9, refusing specific performance of a contract, in Estate of Cyrenius W. Kutz, Deceased. Petition for specific performance of a contract for tbe sale of real estate.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 139, Oct. T., 1917, by The Laurel Hill Valley Coal & Coke Company and Henry D. Green, from decree of O. C. Somerset Co., 1917, No. 9, refusing specific performance of a contract, in Estate of Cyrenius W. Kutz, Deceased. Petition for specific performance of a contract for tbe sale of real estate. Ruppel, P. J., filed tbe following opinion: While there has been considerable testimony taken, there is very little dispute as to the facts, and instead of stating the facts separately in order as requested by counsel for respondents, the court deems it sufficient to give a narrative…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The majority of the court are of opinion that this decree should be affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below dismissing the exceptions to the sale and to the petition for specific performance of contract. Even if there-were any merit in-the- appeal it could not be sustained for the disregard of the rule relating to assigns ments of error. Neither of the two is in proper form.
Decree affirmed at appellants’ costs.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Freeman v. LawtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Heights Land Co. v. Swengel's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Revloc Supply Co. v. TroxellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Girard Mammoth Coal Co. v. Raven Run Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Ginsburg v. CollinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.