Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Lavine

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term, Warren county. Action by Lewis Abrams against Charles Lavine. From an order denying a motion to vacate an attachment, defendant appeals. Reversed

1Per curiam

The grounds upon which plaintiff applied for an attachment were that defendant had failed to meet him at Glens Falls as he had promised to, and that plaintiff saw and had a conversation with one Aronsen, in which the latter said “that said Charles Lavine, the defendant herein; that something about six months ago one Link failed at North Creek, N. Y., at the place where said Lavine is now, and was at that time, doing business; that said Link was assisted during said failure by said Lavine, and that he Was now about to assist said Lavine to sell, assign, dispose of, and secrete his property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Steuben County Bank v. . AlbergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Farley v. ShoemakerNew York Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sill Stove Works v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. Acker, Merrall & Condit v. SaynischCity of New York Municipal Court · 1898
  3. Delaney v. BouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. In re the Probate of the Will of HopkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API