Legal Opinion

Kabatznick, Admr. v. Langer

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 1, 1937No. File #7110PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.

It is not disputed that, on October 1?, 1931, the defendant Benjamin Langer, made his negotiable promis' sory note for $1100.00 payable to the order of “J. Kabat^nick estate” on demand and that the defendant Esther Langer, his wife, indorsed that note for his accommodation. The con' sideration for the note was a loan of $1000.00 made on April 14, 1930 by J. Kabat^nick to Benjamin Langer. There is no allegation of payment nor does the evidence justify a finding that any payment or payments have been made on account of the note.

The complaint does not allege any presentment and demand for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Greenstein v. KucharskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kozienieski v. WhitcombConnecticut Superior Court · 1970
  2. Kozienieski v. WhitcombPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API