Kabatznick, Admr. v. Langer
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
It is not disputed that, on October 1?, 1931, the defendant Benjamin Langer, made his negotiable promis' sory note for $1100.00 payable to the order of “J. Kabat^nick estate” on demand and that the defendant Esther Langer, his wife, indorsed that note for his accommodation. The con' sideration for the note was a loan of $1000.00 made on April 14, 1930 by J. Kabat^nick to Benjamin Langer. There is no allegation of payment nor does the evidence justify a finding that any payment or payments have been made on account of the note.
The complaint does not allege any presentment and demand for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Greenstein v. KucharskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kozienieski v. WhitcombConnecticut Superior Court · 1970
- Kozienieski v. WhitcombPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1970