Legal Opinion

Bath Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Back Creek Mountain Corp.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 13, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.

We state certain facts antecedent to this litigation,, not because we think they materially affect the precise legal propositions here involved, but because they are relied upon by the appellant, recited by the appellee, and are enlightening because they show the previous relations of the parties to each other and to the subject-matter.

Robert Patton, Jr., secured a patent to 45,000' acres of land in what is now Bath and Highland *283counties, Virginia. Some time prior to 1903, H. H. Achenbach and others acquired title to 30,000 acres, more or less, thereof, by several deeds from Fidelity Title…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MundySupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  2. Litz v. RoweSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  3. Cumbee v. RitterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  4. Duty v. Honaker Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sprinkle v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  2. Forrest v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API