Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Hofmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 26, 2001PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Andelas, J.

We agree with the Surrogate that, balancing the public interest in disclosure in a particular case against the benefits to be derived by the parties from confidentiality, movants, despite the parties’ confidentiality agreement, have failed to make the requisite showing of good cause required by section 216.1 (a) of the Uniform Rules for New York State Trial Courts (22 NYCRR 216.1 [a])* to seal the executors’ objections to their application for attorneys’ fees.

The October 29, 1998 agreement, settling the movants’ Supreme Court accounting proceeding in their…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Applehead Pictures LLC v. PerelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Mancheski v. Gabelli Group Capital PartnersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Gryphon Domestic VI, LLC v. APP International Finance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Doe v. New York UniversityNew York Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Maxim Inc. v. FeiferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API