Commonwealth v. Nydam
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
These are eight various complaints framed under the provisions of G. L. c. 140, § 68, and G. L. c. 266, §§ 28, 60 and 139. The defendant was found guilty on all the complaints following a bench trial in a District Court and appealed to the appropriate jury of six session for a trial de nova. In that session he filed (1) a motion to suppress certain evidence procured pursuant to an allegedly invalid series of search warrants and (2) a motion to dismiss all the complaints on the ground (among others) of failure to preserve the evidence in the manner required by G. L. c. 276, §§ 2 and 3. Neither…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Ciummei v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. DuquetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. NealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. SchofieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GreeneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. GarciaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. LopezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Commonwealth v. GreeneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. GreeneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.