Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Nydam

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 29, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

These are eight various complaints framed under the provisions of G. L. c. 140, § 68, and G. L. c. 266, §§ 28, 60 and 139. The defendant was found guilty on all the complaints following a bench trial in a District Court and appealed to the appropriate jury of six session for a trial de nova. In that session he filed (1) a motion to suppress certain evidence procured pursuant to an allegedly invalid series of search warrants and (2) a motion to dismiss all the complaints on the ground (among others) of failure to preserve the evidence in the manner required by G. L. c. 276, §§ 2 and 3. Neither…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Ciummei v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. DuquetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. NealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. SchofieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GreeneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. GarciaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. LopezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. GreeneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. GreeneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API