Thompson v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
The special ground assigns error on the exclusion of the following evidence: “Q. State whether or not other employees were wearing rings at the time you were injured. A. Yes, sir.'' It is contended that by this ruling the plaintiff was not permitted to offer evidence to the effect that there was a universal disregard by all employees of the plant of the company rule relating to wearing of rings, known to the employer, and of such magnitude as to constitute a waiver on the part of the employer of its enforcement of the rule amounting to an abrogation thereof. While appropriate evidence if…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rocco v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Brock v. Mobile & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Shepard v. PayneUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Hampton v. Wabash Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co v. StinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Emmett E. Page v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Central of Georgia Railroad v. LightseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Thompson v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957