Legal Opinion · Concurrence

O'DOWD v. Linehan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1971No. 10 October Term 1970, No. 13 April Term 1971, Docket No. 52,402Published

1ConcurrenceWilliams, J.

I concur with the result in this case for reasons stated in my concurring opinion in People v. Zimmerman, (1971), 385 Mich 417, decided today. In the Zimmerman case, Billings would have testified in two different areas of expertise. First, as to speed from skid marks, there was an inadequate showing of data that the state of the art is developed to the point that it has a reasonable degree of reliability. Second, as to speed plus impact, there was no showing of the state of the art or the witnesses’ qualifications in the area.

The facts of this case involve accident reconstruction which is an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dudek v. PoppMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Washburn v. LucasMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. ZimmermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Deaver v. HickoxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  5. Jackson v. TroganMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API