Legal Opinion

Puleston v. United States

District Court, N.D. Florida

Decided July 7, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAYNE, District Judge.

The respective parties, by their attorneys, have filed a stipulation covering all the facts relied on in the case, leaving only to the court such questions of law as have not already been passed upon on the demurrer.

In items 3, 4, 5, and 22 of Schedule A, the question is presented as to whether mileage, under paragraph 25, § 829, Rev. St., should be continuous, or if the deputy can claim actual mileage traveled, when a part of the trig is made at one time, and after the lapse of several days the trip is completed. Said paragraph reads a,s follows: “For travel in going…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. John H. Randolph, of Algernon S. Randolph, Deceased, in Error v. Israel Barrett, of Joel F. Randolph, Deceased, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  3. United States v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Kinney v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1893
  5. Puleston v. United StatesUnited States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. PulestonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1901
  2. Safford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  3. Swift v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API