Legal Opinion

PM & R Associates v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 2000No. F032156PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VARTABEDIAN, J.

In this petition for a writ of review, we are called upon to determine whether a licensed physician in California may use medical assistants to render adjunct services involving concepts of physical therapy to a patient; the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) found such treatment illegal per se because such services may only be rendered personally by the physician, a licensed physical therapist, or by a physical therapy aide acting under the continuing and immediate supervision of a licensed physical therapist. We disagree with the WCAB ruling.

Procedural…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Magit v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Garamendi v. Executive Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Bell v. Samaritan Medical Clinic, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Hand Rehabilitation Center v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Poet v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Stiger v. FlippinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Zenith Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. POET v. Air Resources Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API