Legal Opinion
Federal Kemper Insurance v. Sicherman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 20, 1990No. Civ. A. 88-9757PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This action for a declaratory judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2201 (West 1982 & Supp.1990), is before us on diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332 (West 1966 & Supp.1990). Plaintiff Federal Kemper Insurance Company (“Federal Kemper”) seeks a declaration concerning a certain Automobile Insurance Policy issued to defendant Jay W. Charles, covering a 1983 Dodge Omni automobile (the “Omni”). Federal Kemper claims it is not obligated to defend or indemnify Jay Charles’ son Robert W. Charles or the Estate of Andrew C. Sicherman for…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Countryway Insurance v. SlaugenhoupDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Federal Kemper Insurance Company v. Sicherman (Surena M.), Estate of Sicherman (Andrew C.), Charles (Robert W., Jay W.), Davis (Joseph K., Shirley A.), Estate of Davis (Jo Ann) Davis (Joseph K., Shirley A.), Estate of Davis (Jo Ann)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991