Legal Opinion
47 Ave. B. East Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 22, 2009PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed with costs, and the petition dismissed. The State Liquor Authority (SLA)’s finding that petitioner permitted overcrowding on the premises in violation of SLA rules was supported by substantial evidence (300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc, v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180 [1978]).
Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum; Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by8 opinions
- Braden Food & Drink, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- MATTER OF 47 AVE. B. EAST INC. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Matter of SCE Group Inc. v. New York State Liq. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- 2169 Central Ltd. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- 2169 Central Ltd. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.