Legal Opinion

Cory Birnberg APC v. Pozos

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 29, 2006No. 05-16195Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Ana Pozos appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Cory Birnberg APC, in Birnberg’s action to enforce an order awarding attorney fees pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 928(c) in a Long-shore and Harbor Workers Compensation case. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Feiler v. United States, 62 F.3d 315, 316 (9th Cir.1995), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Birnberg’s attorney fee order was enforceable and the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain Pozos’ challenges to the ALJ’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kenneth E. Thompson v. Potashnick Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Feiler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API