Legal Opinion

Morrow v. Inhabitants of Vernon

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1872PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This case was tried at the Sussex Circuit Court, September Term, 1871, and a verdict rendered for the plaintiff, for the amount of the note held by him, and interest. The motion for a rule to show cause was argued in this court, on a state of the case agreed upon by the parties.

Read the full summary

This case was tried at the Sussex Circuit Court, September Term, 1871, and a verdict rendered for the plaintiff, for the amount of the note held by him, and interest. The motion for a rule to show cause was argued in this court, on a state of the case agreed upon by the parties. It shows the note or writing upon which the action was founded, as follows : “ $400. “ One year after date, the township of Vernon promises to pay Thomas Jennings or bearer, the sum of four hundred dollars, for relieving the township of one man, in the draft that has just fallen upon the township in the call for three…

1Opinion of the CourtScudder, J.

The first cause assigned for setting aside the verdict, that the township committee had uo power to make such contract, and that the inhabitants of the township could not confer such authority upon them for the special purposes named therein, under the general powers contained in sections eleven and twelve of township acts, (Nix. Dig. 979,*) is answered by the act approved March 27th, 1866, (Laws of 1866, p. 706,) which enacts “that the proceedings of the inhabitants of said township, at said town meetings, and the acts and doings of the town committee, in carrying the same into effect, be,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BlackNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API