Legal Opinion

Kilpatrick v. McGill

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 31, 1880Published

APPEAL FROM LARUE CIRCUIT COURT.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

The rule which exonerates a surety in consequence of some act or omission on the part of the creditor is based on the peculiar nature of the contract and the relation between the parties.

Judge Strong says the contract of suretyship imports entire good faith and confidence between the parties, and treats the relation between the creditor and the surety as analogous to the relation between trustee and cestui que trust, guardian and ward, and partner and partner. Secs. 322, 323 and 324, Equity Jurisdiction. It is because of this relation that any act or omission on the part…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Neel v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API