Legal Opinion

Smith v. Schlein

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 30, 1944No. 8642PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Associate Justice.

The statement of facts in the complaint, which for the purpose of this appeal must be taken as true, is substantially as follows : Defendants loaned plaintiff $400. As a cloak to hide usurious interest they took a note from plaintiff in the sum of $750, with interest at six per cent, secured by a trust deed on plaintiff’s real property in Maryland. After the plaintiff had repaid $150 the defendants began foreclosure proceedings in Maryland. In order to obtain title to plaintiff’s property defendants fraudulently represented to her that if she would not oppose…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marshall v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Hewitt v. HewittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  3. Irving Trust Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. Wilmer v. PlacideCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schlein v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  2. Douglass v. First National Realty CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API