Legal Opinion

Flink v. American Alternative Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2000No. 99-438Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 Annette Flink appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court awarding her a 20 percent penalty on retroactive benefits, denying her request for attorney fees, and holding that the insurer properly calculated her weekly wage using a 40-hour work week. We reverse. There is one dispositive issue on appeal: Whether the Workers’ Compensation Court erred in concluding that Flink’s average weekly wage was properly calculated?

BACKGROUND

¶2 Flink was hired by Missoula Textile Services as a garment sorter and started work on May 19,1998. On her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matthews v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Madill v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Robertson v. Aero Power-Vac, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API