Legal Opinion

Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. Standard Safety Razor Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 3, 1933No. 338PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

The charge of infringement of this patent involves a consideration, of claims 1, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 11 of the patent to Thompson & Smith, No. 3,858,316. In a companion appeal, we considered the Thompson patent, No. 1,815,745, where we held that the appellant, who sold blades usable in the Gillette safety razors, was not guilty of contributory infringement. 64 F(2d) 6.

The invention in this suit is claimed to be the idea of replacing the three holes in the razor blade with a slot to fit a bar to be used in the bar type razor. The patentees placed a long bar in the Thompson…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Electric Auto-Lite Co. v. P. & D. MFG. CO.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  3. Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. Standard Safety Razor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  4. Eversharp, Inc. v. PHILIP MORRIS, INCORPORATEDDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1966
  5. Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. Essex Razor Blade Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API