Legal Opinion
United States v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 27, 1997No. Nos. 96-2003, 96-2051PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
No. 96-2003 affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part and No. 96-2051 affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge STAMP joined. Judge NIEMEYER wrote separately, concurring in part and dissenting in part.
OPINION
DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge:
In 1984, pursuant to its authority under the Clean Air Act, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated regulations governing fugitive emissions of benzene, a carcinogenic pollutant posing significant risk to human health. This case involves the proper interpretation of those…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. DeatonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Ancient Coin Collectors GuildCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- United States v. DeatonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Duke Energy Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.