Legal Opinion

Thibaut & Walker Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided June 11, 1940No. Docket No. 96149Published

UNDISTRIBUTED PROFITS TAX - CREDIT - CONTRACT RESTRICTING DIVIDENDS. - A contract whereby four sole stockholders-directors agreed to vote for a dividend policy requiring the addition of $15,000 of annual earnings to surplus and to which contract the corporation was a party, does not entitled the corporation to a credit under section 26(c)(1) of the Revenue Act of 1936.

1Opinion of the Court

THE THIBAUT & WALKER COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Thibaut & Walker Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 96149.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

42 B.T.A. 29; 1940 BTA LEXIS 1062;

June 11, 1940, Promulgated

UNDISTRIBUTED PROFITS TAX - CREDIT - CONTRACT RESTRICTING DIVIDENDS. - A contract whereby four sole stockholders-directors agreed to vote for a dividend policy requiring the addition of $15,000 of annual earnings to surplus and to which contract the corporation was a party, does not entitled the corporation to a credit under section 26(c)(1) of the Revenue Act…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thibaut & Walker Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API