Ainsworth v. Sessions
Connecticut Superior Court
PiotitioN for a new trial, upon the ground that one Payne, who was relied upon as a principal witness in the cause through surprise or some unaccountable cause, was so disconcerted and confused in bis evidence, that neither court nor jury could understand him, whereby the petitioner lost his case, and that said Payne is now able to testify in the clearest manner, which will give the case to the petitioner, and states what he will testify.
Read the full summary
PiotitioN for a new trial, upon the ground that one Payne, who was relied upon as a principal witness in the cause through surprise or some unaccountable cause, was so disconcerted and confused in bis evidence, that neither court nor jury could understand him, whereby the petitioner lost his case, and that said Payne is now able to testify in the clearest manner, which will give the case to the petitioner, and states what he will testify. Plea in abatement — That said Payne is not a new evidence, and to grant new trials upon the after recollection and additional testimony of former witnesses,…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Although the objection in the plea is conclusive in all cases where it applies; but where a party is deprived of his most material evidence by some unaccountable •cause, as by being panic struck, or by a paralytic shock, or other affection which for that time, has deranged the recollection of the witness so that the party loses the benefit of his testimony; this appealing clearly to be the case, reason and justice require that the party should be relieved against such a misfortune, by a new trial, as much as when he is deprived of his evidence by sickness or absence; but in such…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Jenks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Shields v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877