Legal Opinion
Duncan and Smith v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 4, 1976No. [No. 88, September Term, 1975.]PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Our grant of the writ of certiorari in this case was “limited solely to the issue set forth in the petition for writ of certiorari,” which was:
“Did the Court of Special Appeals err in holding that the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Cecil Jones v. United States [, 362 U. S. 257, 80 S. Ct. 725, 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960),] is no longer controlling law in Maryland and that the Petitioners, by relying upon the rule, of automatic standing which that case established, failed to show that they had standing to challenge the legality of the search of an automobile and seizure therefrom of…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Duncan and Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Ricks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Gahan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Hepple v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Tate and Hall v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.