Legal Opinion

In Re Bomarito

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California

Decided April 29, 2011No. 19-10366PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION REGARDING UNITED STATES TRUSTEE’S MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(3)(B)

W. RICHARD LEE, Bankruptcy Judge.

Under the Bankruptcy Code, any party in interest to a chapter 7 case filed by an individual debtor may bring a motion to dismiss the case upon a showing that the granting of relief, a chapter 7 discharge, would constitute an abuse of the provisions of chapter 7. 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(1). 1 The Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure require, with one exception not applicable here, 2 that a motion to dismiss for “abuse” must be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Sullivan v. StroopSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. In Re NowinskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  4. In Re FarhidDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
  5. In Re DesiderioUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. 421 Chestnut Partners, LP v. Aloia (In re Aloia)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Elizabeth Retail Properties LLC v. Keybank National Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  3. Alarid, Jr. v. PachecoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
  4. In re: Lusine HakhverdianUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2026
  5. John H. HollandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API