Legal Opinion

General Ceramics Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 16, 1961No. C.D. 2230PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

This is a protest, filed by an American manufacturer pursuant to section 616(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, against the collector’s assessment of duty on certain so-called ferrite articles described as follows:

Entry No. Date Invoice No. Invoice description

475491 10/23/59 25275 56.907.49/3E1 Ferroxcube E Cores

25276 K5281 35/6F Square Loop Rings

477281 10/30/59 25288 K3 00.0 61 Ferroxcube Potcores

25289 K3 005 02/3E1 Ferroxcube Toroids

K3 005 00/3E1 Ferroxcube Potcores

K5281 35/6F Square Loop Rings

Ferroxdure X Blocks, unmagnetized

Sa…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vandegrift v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Vantine & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Enesco Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API