General Ceramics Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Judge:
This is a protest, filed by an American manufacturer pursuant to section 616(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, against the collector’s assessment of duty on certain so-called ferrite articles described as follows:
Entry No. Date Invoice No. Invoice description
475491 10/23/59 25275 56.907.49/3E1 Ferroxcube E Cores
25276 K5281 35/6F Square Loop Rings
477281 10/30/59 25288 K3 00.0 61 Ferroxcube Potcores
25289 K3 005 02/3E1 Ferroxcube Toroids
K3 005 00/3E1 Ferroxcube Potcores
K5281 35/6F Square Loop Rings
Ferroxdure X Blocks, unmagnetized
Sa…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Vandegrift v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Vantine & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
3Cited by1 opinion
- Enesco Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968