Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Roberts

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 1897No. 2,225PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Pulaski Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Henley, J. —

Appellee recovered a judgment in the lower court against appellant for $1,280.00. The complaint was in two paragraphs, both substantially the *539same, wherein it was charged, that appellant negligently permitted combustibles to accumulate and remain on its right of way; that the same were ignited by sparks from its locomotive, and that the fire so kindled was, by appellant, negligently permitted to escape from the right of way of appellant and spread over and burn appellee’s property, without fault or negligence on the part of appellee. Both paragraphs of complaint were held good…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. BushIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Conner v. Citizens Street Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railway Co. v. BurgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Cleveland, Columbus, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HadleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dodge Manufacturing Co. v. KronewitterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. KranzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. City of Alexandria v. YoungIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. CarmonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Martz v. Floral Products Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API