Legal Opinion

City of Ferndale v. Ealand

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1979No. Docket 77-4344PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. M. Maher, J.

Plaintiff brought this action in 1975 against defendant owners and operators of the Studio North Theatre, alleging that the theatre was operating in violation of the city zoning ordinance and was, therefore, a nuisance per se subject to abatement under MCL 125.587; MSA 5.2937 Plaintiff also alleged that defendant theatre was operating without the license required by another city ordinance. After considerable procedural difficulties not material to this appeal, the matter at last came on for trial in 1977. At the close of plaintiffs proofs, the trial court granted defendants’ motion for a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Kirk v. Tyrone TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Paul v. University Motor Sales Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Mary v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Ferndale v. EalandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Deperno Law Office Pllc v. Schwartz's Hvac LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API