People v. Bailey

The hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to suppress his statement to law enforcement officials at the precinct. The evidence at the hearing established that, contrary to the defendant’s contention, his statement was not the product of custodial interrogation (see Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 [1966]; People v Yukl, 25 NY2d 585, 589 [1969], cert denied 400 US 851 [1970]; People v Watson, *101217 AD3d 385 [2005]; People v Parsad, 243 AD2d 510, 511 [1997]).

The defendant’s contention that the prosecution failed to disprove his justification defense by…