Legal Opinion

Hunter v. O'NEILL

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided May 5, 1993No. 05-93-00217-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAGARDE, Justice.

This is a mandamus action against the Honorable Michael J. O’Neill. William Hunter, relator, petitions this Court to order Judge O’Neill to vacate his order denying a new trial. We conclude that Hunter is entitled to mandamus relief and, accordingly, conditionally grant his petition for writ of mandamus.

Timetables under both the rules of civil procedure and the rules of appellate procedure determine the outcome of this case. The following is a list of the pertinent events and the dates on which they occurred:

[[Image here]]

August 24, 1992 Motion for new trial filed

Octobe…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fruehauf Corp. v. CarrilloTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Fulton v. FinchTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Humble Exploration Co. v. Browning, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  4. Homart Development Co. v. Blanton, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  5. Alvarez v. Brasch, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. Globe-Texas Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
  2. In Re Luster, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  3. In Re Steiger, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  4. Garcia v. Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
  5. Jaime Garcia and Blanca Garcia v. Jose Luis Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API