Legal Opinion

Moon v. Moon

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1887PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Bird, Y. C.

After a good deal of attention to this case, I am quite clear that the motion to set aside the order allowing the petitioner to prosecute his suit in forma pauperis ought to prevail. And I am satisfied that the discretionary power given to the court by the statute (Rev. 319 § 33), can be exercised in revoking such an order as well as in making one.

I have come to the conclusion that the petitioner ought to be ordered to pay alimony to the defendant. As the case now *404stands before me I am justified in this. Since he is doing nothing towards her support, he can .do something towards…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. McClure v. McClureNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API