Legal Opinion

School District Number Eight v. Root

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Mandamus to a town treasurer to compel the payment of warrants drawn on him, in favor of the assessor of a school district, by the acting director and moderator. The facts-are stated in the opinion, and in head-note 1.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

The school district, complaining as relator, by Hiram Green, assessor, and Thomas J. Hcald, director, asks a mandamus to respondent to compel him to pay over to the assessor the school moneys in his hands belonging to the district, upon certain warrants dated March 3, 1886, signed by Mr. Ileald as director, and countersigned by James Dowris as moderator.

The only substantial objection made by the respondent is that Dowris is not the moderator, but that Chauncey H. Baldwin is the lawful incumbent. We discover no other question that seems of any importance.

The objection is based upon certain…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnston v. State ex rel. SeftonIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Ashwell v. BullockMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Keeler v. DeoMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Lachance v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Hartwig v. Mayor of ManisteeMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API