Legal Opinion

Stephen Rug Mills v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 9, 1944No. C. D. 831Published

1Opinion of the Court

Kincheloe, Judge:

These suits are for the recovery of certain customs duty alleged to have been improperly assessed by the collector of customs at New York on imported rugs. The merchandise in issue consists of rugs composed wholly or in chief value of cotton, imported from Belgium and Italy. They were assessed for duty at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem under the provision of paragraph 921 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which, so far as pertinent, reads as follows:

Par. 921. * * * all other floor coverings, including * * * rugs, wholly or in chief value of cotton, 35 per centum ad valorem.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Field & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. Protests 929122-G of Torino Trading Corp.United States Customs Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API