Legal Opinion
Thurman Conn v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 9, 1989No. 88-5074PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Thurman Conn appeals the district court’s grant of the government’s motion to dismiss his action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 2671-80. Conn argues that the court improperly concluded that he had failed to exhaust his administrative remedy as is required by that statute. The United States contends that Conn did not properly present his claim to the administrative agency, a prerequisite to the filing of suit against the United States, and that Conn’s claim is further barred by the statute of limitations. Because we hold that Conn’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gaf Corporation v. United States of America. Keene Corporation v. United States of America. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Gary L. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Willard D. Douglas and Violet A. Douglas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Robert Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Jesse J. Avila, Guardian Ad Litem of Daniel Cardona v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Judy Lehman, Wife Mark Lehman, Husband v. United States of America, Judy Lehman, Wife Mark Lehman, Husband v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Dianne Khan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Ellison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Hodder v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Conaway v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.