Saenz v. McCormick Construction Co.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceLopez, Judge
(specially concurring).
In their Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint, the Defendants assert that the voluntary compensation benefits were paid under Texas law. To support this, they introduced an affidavit of the insurance claims adjustor at the Summary Judgment hearing. The insurance claims adjustor handles workmen’s compensation claims for the Home Insurance Company in the region of El Paso and southern New Mexico. The affidavit asserts that the compensation and other benefits were paid Plaintiff under the Texas Workmen's Compensation Law. Until the prosecution of this suit, Plaintiff claims he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Elsea v. Broome Furniture Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Schiller v. Southwest Air Rangers, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Anaya v. New Mexico Steel Erectors, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. ChapmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Reed v. Fish Engineering CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.