Legal Opinion

Hashimoto v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1989No. 87-120, 87-121Published

1Opinion of the Court

767 P.2d 158 (1989)

Lloyd K. HASHIMOTO, Appellant (Plaintiff),

v.

MARATHON PIPE LINE CO., a Delaware corporation, and Penton Jerry Dixon, Appellees (Defendants).

MARATHON PIPE LINE CO., a Delaware corporation, and Penton Jerry Dixon, Appellants (Defendants),

v.

Lloyd K. HASHIMOTO, Appellee (Plaintiff).

Nos. 87-120, 87-121.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

January 6, 1989.

John E. Stanfield and Bruce Waters of Smith, Stanfield & Scott, Laramie, for Hashimoto.

Richard E. Day of Williams, Porter, Day & Neville, Casper, and Daniel J. Sullenbarger of Marathon Pipe Line Co., Houston, Tex., for Marathon Pipe Line Co.

B…

Also in this document: Dissent · Rose; Dissent · Thomas.

2Cases cited98 opinions

  1. Matott v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. ABC Builders, Inc. v. PhillipsWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HarriettTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Anderson v. BauerWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State National Bank of El Paso v. Farah Manufacturing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1984

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API