Hashimoto v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
767 P.2d 158 (1989)
Lloyd K. HASHIMOTO, Appellant (Plaintiff),
v.
MARATHON PIPE LINE CO., a Delaware corporation, and Penton Jerry Dixon, Appellees (Defendants).
MARATHON PIPE LINE CO., a Delaware corporation, and Penton Jerry Dixon, Appellants (Defendants),
v.
Lloyd K. HASHIMOTO, Appellee (Plaintiff).
Nos. 87-120, 87-121.
Supreme Court of Wyoming.
January 6, 1989.
John E. Stanfield and Bruce Waters of Smith, Stanfield & Scott, Laramie, for Hashimoto.
Richard E. Day of Williams, Porter, Day & Neville, Casper, and Daniel J. Sullenbarger of Marathon Pipe Line Co., Houston, Tex., for Marathon Pipe Line Co.
B…
Also in this document: Dissent · Rose; Dissent · Thomas.
2Cases cited98 opinions
- Matott v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- ABC Builders, Inc. v. PhillipsWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HarriettTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Anderson v. BauerWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- State National Bank of El Paso v. Farah Manufacturing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1984
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.