Roland Ware v. Kenneth Dean Reed, as an Individual and in His Capacity as Sheriff of Caldwell County, Texas
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge:
Improper jury instructions can sometimes prevent a conscientious and attentive jury from unweaving a tangled web. In this appeal from a general verdict against him, Roland Ware assails the district court’s instructions to the jury on his federal and state law claims. General instructions were given to the jury on Ware’s federal, but not his state law claims. When considered with the most liberal gloss we can place on them, we find that the instructions were deficient in several constitutional dimensions. We therefore reverse.
I. The Facts
Roland Ware brought suit…
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Williams v. BramerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Luther Wilkins, Jr. v. James A. MayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Ikerd v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Joyce Wells v. Hico Independent School District, Etc., Veriena Braune v. Hico Independent School District, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.