Legal Opinion

United States v. Account No. 50-2830-2

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided March 1, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 91-D-689-EPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DE MENT, District Judge.

A hearing on the above-styled action was held on September 26, 1994. The United States of America contends that the currency at issue is the corpus delicti of “structuring.” The United States avers that the subject financial institution and Dr. Richard T. Lowe, the depositor of the subject currency, colluded to evade the reporting requirement on a certain financial transaction. Consequently, the Government claims that the currency involved in said transaction is subject to forfeiture. Claimant Dr. Richard T. Lowe contends that hone of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. Banco Cafetero Panama, Banco Cafetero Colon, Defendants-In-Rem-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Little Al, A/K/A Texas Ranger, Etc., Charles Thomas Pollard, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Knight v. General Telecom, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API