Legal Opinion

In re Coddington

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1902No. 185PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On exceptions to report of referee.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, District Judge.

It is objected that the only evidence on the subject of the respondent’s insolvency was that which was obtained by calling and cross-examining him, which, it is claimed, the creditors had no right to do. But by section 3 d of the bankrupt act it is specially provided that, where a preferential transfer of property while insolvent is charged as the act of bankruptcy relied upon, the person against whom the petition has been filed is required to appear at the hearing with his books, papers^ and accounts, and submit to an examination, as well as give testimony as to all…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pinto v. Philadelphia Fresh Food Terminal Corp. (In Re Pinto)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. In re HinesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1906
  3. Irving Trust Co. v. Manufacturers' Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934
  4. Heldman v. Central Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
  5. Louisiana Nat. Life Assur. Society v. SegenDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API