Legal Opinion

HOSKINS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 2020No. 2:10-cv-05851Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MUHAMMAD WALIYUD-DIN : a/k/a “William R. Hoskins,” Petitioner : CIVIL ACTION v. : : NO. 10-5851 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF : THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, : Respondent MEMORANDUM PRATTER, J. OCTOBER LZ 2020 Muhammad Waliyud-Din, a/k/a William R. Hoskins, moves to amend or alter judgment under Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Commonwealth did not file a response to the motion. For the reasons that follow, the Court denies the motion. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In 1976, Mr. Waliyud-Din was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API