Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Pier 1 Imports (US), Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 7, 2006No. CIV.S-04-633 LKK/CMKPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KARLTON, Senior District Judge.
This court recently issued an order in the above-captioned case denying defendants’ motion to declare plaintiff and his attorney vexatious litigants. Wilson v. Pier 1 Imports, 411 F.Supp.2d 1196, 2006 WL 213823 (E.D.Cal.2006). The parties have also filed cross-motions for summary judgment. This order addresses one aspect of those motions.
As the previous order noted, plaintiff is a person with a disability who, on various occasions, has visited the store the defendants own and operate in Fairfield, California. He asserts that during his visits he has…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Elk Grove Unified School District v. NewdowSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Federal Election Commission v. AkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Doran v. 7-Eleven, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Wilson v. Pier 1 Imports (US), Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2006
- Doran v. 7-Eleven, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Kohler v. CJP, LTD.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Doran v. 7-Eleven, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.