Legal Opinion

Popal v. Hanophy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 18, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the respondent Robert J. Hanophy, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, from commencing trial in an underlying criminal action entitled People v Popal, pending under Queens County Indictment No. 2186/02.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holtzman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. GiordanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Wright v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API